The Nullification Crisis of 1832 primarily stemmed from which development in the United States?

The Nullification Crisis of 1832 was primarily rooted in the tensions arising from the economic differences between the North and the South. The North was increasingly becoming a manufacturing hub, benefiting from protective tariffs that promoted domestic industries. In contrast, the South, particularly states like South Carolina, was predominantly agrarian and heavily reliant on exports, such as cotton, which made them particularly sensitive to tariffs that raised the cost of imported goods.

When the federal government enacted high tariffs, Southern states felt economically oppressed, leading to a belief that they could nullify federal laws that they deemed harmful to their interests. South Carolina, under the leadership of figures like John C. Calhoun, asserted the right to nullify these tariffs, claiming that states had the authority to reject federal mandates they found unconstitutional. This crisis highlighted the growing economic divergence between the North and South, ultimately contributing to tensions that would lead to the Civil War.

The other choices do touch on significant issues of the time, but they do not directly explain the primary cause of the Nullification Crisis. For instance, while pressures from frontier settlers and considerations of suffrage were relevant societal topics, they were not the immediate catalysts for the specific conflict over tariffs.